Working Hard to Safeguard Paddling Assets for All Canadians

All about Whitewater

All about Whitewater
A Blog about River Preservation and the need to protect our free flowing whitewater resources

Wednesday, September 10, 2025

Onimiki Reserve flow negotiations




Before the dam at Laniel was refurbished in 2005 it leaked water at its base at a rate of 30 cms.

This enabled navigation of the river all summer long.

The refurbished dam, it was warned by Les Amis, would wickedly enabled the perfect diversion of water from the river.

The judge cited in Federal case T-452-06   that the water releases would continue as they had historically been done.

CEAA requires that cummulative environmental effects be considered...Before the dam at Laniel was refurbished in 2005 it leaked water at its base at a rate of 30 cms.

That is the minimum reserve requirement of the Kipawa river. Would you be prepared to fight for that?

Further, the Kipawa receives additional flows throughout the paddling season.  The weekends of the rally are up to 300 cms and beyond.

Are you willing to fight for that?

For comparison look to the AWA's struggle to prevent diversion of the Ocoee River.

A cubic meter is about 35 cubic feet.

On the Ocoee

The work of the AWA has been outstanding.but they have money and people.

We need.

1. A water management plan including:
a)schedule of releases
b)an acceptable reserve flow

Consult with MKC regarding the Bark Lake Dam agreement

c) an accepted representation

Middle Ocoee has 116 day of release per year.  TVA says avg. flow is 1,250 cfs.  Guaranteed flows of at least 1,100 cfs although it varies a bit due to inflows.  When not releasing for recreation, the power project provides up to 21 megawatts of hydro.   Releases for recreation are on weekends April, May, September, and October and Thursday through Monday, June, July and August.  Some years, there is a release on the last weekend in March.

River drops 269 feet over 5 miles from put-in to take-out


River Preservation is the issue

The judicial review was about keeping the water going through the dam, putting facts on the record, making sure the Kipawa continued to be navigable.

The judges decision comments specifically on this point.

https://decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca/fc-cf/decisions/en/item/54660/index.do?q=Les+amis&fbclid=IwY2xjawMuWgBleHRuA2FlbQIxMQABHqwwRYM8xQZOebplgfPwcA0paLvgpF9azxnMPEovao38Lb8eBvLNRKXuXcYU_aem_5Bp7brinXWtaq-pwqBNfYA

Note: in this case their bad decision was not illegal..their process was bad. The recourse was a new EA, we did not get it.

 The point is single minded  development...and that is the environment today- ram infrastructure projects through, and native reconciliation.

First the officials said navigation was illegal and wrongly cited the Dam Safety Act. We proved that it was the dam itself that was illegal having never been approved.

Then officials said it was unsafe. We proved that dam had been safely navigated over a period of long standing, 40+ years and heavily attended whitewater festivals.

Finally officials said that that the loss of the right to navigate the dam was insignificant. We then saw the creation of Opemican National Park...and then the image of the Grand Chute appeared on the back of the Canada 150th anniversary ten dollar bill.

Project proponents including their bureaucratic enablers are not going to protect anything. Neither will the legal system.
People need to mobilize. People power alone will stop them.


Concerning water management of flows on the Madawaska River at MKC.

From Claudia

How we came to the whitewater releases as OPG calls them, was a long time ago – my parents felt that 900 cfs on the middle Mad was the ideal water flow for both kayak/canoe and rafting. They asked Ontario Hydro “how much water needs to flow downstream over a 7-day period, even in a drought year.” This came to 26 hours at 900cfs, (26cms) which was based on the average flow required through the Arnprior waste management system, daily: 10cms. The minimum flow to maintain healthy aqua life is 3-5cms. 

My parents chose 6.5hours of whitewater release (26cms) per day on Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday and Thursday: 9:30-4pm. Weekends would have been overtime, and charged for a release. 

The middle Mad is located between two release dams: Bark Lake and Palmer. The minimum flow at Palmer is 10cms which meets this requirement. 

It is a unique set up in that whitewater releases aren’t impeding power generation demands

Caveat:

You think it might be fair? The bureaucrats are paid to see that the project goes through. They are not your "friends".

Many are more conerned, understandably about their jobs, their pensions...and will simple tow the line.

They will collude, and conspire.

They will focus on their objectives, msybe they will be bribed.

Some move between government and private firms to work.

In the end, it is the resource, the river that always loses.




No comments:

Canadian Rivers

Canadian Rivers
I speak for river users too!

The Queen is not amused!

The Queen is not amused!
http://www.ispeakforcanadianrivers.ca/

The Damned Dam - 2005 -

The Damned Dam - 2005 -
22nd Annual Kipaw Rally has modest turnout. - 23rd does better

The Ashlu river: it could happen to you

The Ashlu river: it could happen to you

Whitewater Ontario

Whitewater Ontario
Working Hard to Protect Canada's Paddling Resources

Whitewater Ontario - Mission Statement

It is Whitewater Ontario’s mission to support the whitewater paddling community through the promotion, development and growth of the sport in its various disciplines. We accomplish this through the development of events, resources, clubs, and programs for personal and athletic development, regardless of skill level or focus, to ensure a high standard of safety and competency; We advocate safe and environmentally responsible access and use of Ontario’s rivers. Whitewater Ontario is the sport governing body in the province, and represents provincial interests within the national body Whitewater Canada and the Canadian Canoe Association http://www.whitewaterontario.ca/page/mission.asp

Kipawa, Tabaret, and Opemican

Kipawa, Tabaret, and Opemican
If Hydro Quebec is not actively pursuing Tabaret what is that bite out of Opemican for?

Kipawa Dam: After

Kipawa Dam: After
Laniel Dam at 2006 Rally

Where is the Kipawa

Where is the Kipawa
Kipawa flows into lake Temiskamingue, running from Kipawa Lake, under hwy 101 in Quebec

Kipawa Dam

Kipawa Dam
laniel dam at 2004 River Rally

Tabaret is a Bad Idea

About the Kipawa



The best thing paddlers can do to help the cause of the Kipawa:

1. attend the rally and bring others including non paddlers to attend and buy beer and have fun

2. write your MP /MNA and raise the issue and post your objections -1 letter = 200 who didn't write

3. Write Thierry Vandal the CEO of Hydro Quebec strongly opposing the 132 MW standard decrying the use of "diversion" as the most environmentally inappropriate method of power production

4. Write Jean Charest, Premier of Quebec protesting that either the algonquin or the tabaret project will eliminate all other values on the Kipawa River by turning it into a dry gulch.

5. See if you can get other allied groups interested by showing your own interest, ie the Sierra Defense Fund, Earthwild, MEC, and so on.

6. Demand further consultation

7. Currently we are at the point where we need to sway public opinion and raise awareness.

However, if all else fails, don't get mad, simply disrupt, foment, and protest . The Monkey Wrench Gang.

Have you read Edward Abbey?

Important Addresses
CEO,Hydro Québec, 75 boul René Levesque, Montreal, P.Q., H2Z 1A4Caille.andre@hydro.qc.ca



Tabaret is a Bad Idea (Part Two)

Les Amis de la Riviere Kipawa is poised to use an application to the Federal Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus to ensure the Minster does what he is supposed to do, protect the public's right to navigate the water control structure at Laniel, Quebec using the Navigable Waters Protection Act. (see http://www.kipawariver.ca/)

In the now gutted Navigable Waters Protection Act lay the means by which the Minister of Transport could keep the public right of passage down our great Canadian Heritage, our rivers and streams which are threatened especially by resource corporations and power brokers such as Hydro Quebec.

These powerful entities continue to petition that 'this' river or 'that' stream is not navigable and therefore not protectable.
I don't say that dams and bridges should not be built, only that if they are, historical navigation rights should be considered and preserved by making reasonable accommodations for recreational boaters.

It is the Minister of Transport, in exercising the right to allow or disallow work on or over a navigable waterway is what keeps boats and recreational boaters plying our waterways.

To many recent cases launched in the Federal Court concerning the Navigable Waters Protection Act, most recently the case of the Humber Environment Group of Cornerbrook Newfoundland versus the Cornerbrook Pulp and Paper Company indicates that the important oversight is not being faithfully performed. Have we really come to the point now where we must say "such and such a stream is one foot deep, possessing so many cubic feet per second flow and so on?" The answer to this is... YES!

The honourable Mr. Justice John A. O'Keefe, ruled that it had not been shown that the river was navigable. How convenient was that to the Minister? But either the Minister of Transport acts to protect our rivers and streams as a public right or he does not and that means rivers and streams currently enjoyed by kayakers and canoists.

Enough of the cheating, and double-talk. Canadians! our rivers and streams are our own, lets urge the Minister of Transport and the our government to protect them.

Peter Karwacki

Tabaret is a Bad Idea (Part Three)

10 Reasons WhyTabaret is a Bad Idea1) Tabaret is too big. The station is designed to useevery drop of water available in the Kipawawatershed, but will run at only 44 percent capacity.We believe the Tabaret station is designed to usewater diverted from the Dumoine River into theKipawa watershed in the future. 2) The Tabaret project will eliminate the aquaticecosystem of the Kipawa River.The Tabaret project plan involves the diversion of a16-km section of the Kipawa River from its naturalstreambed into a new man-made outflow from LakeKipawa. 3) Tabaret will leave a large industrial footprint on thelandscape that will impact existing tourismoperations and eliminate future tourism potential. 4) The Tabaret project is an aggressive single-purposedevelopment, designed to maximize powergeneration at the expense of all other uses. 5) River-diversion, such as the Tabaret project, takinglarge amounts of water out of a river’s naturalstreambed and moving it to another place, is verydestructive to the natural environment. 6) The Kipawa River has been designated a protectedgreenspace in the region with severe limitations ondevelopment. This designation recognizes theecological, historical and natural heritage value ofthe river and the importance of protecting it.Tabaret will eliminate that value. 7) If necessary, there are other, smarter and morereasonable options for producing hydro power onthe Kipawa watershed. It is possible to build a lowimpactgenerating station on the Kipawa river, andmanage it as a “run-of-the-river” station, makinguse of natural flows while maintaining other values,with minimal impact on the environment. 8) The Kipawa watershed is a rich natural resource forthe Temiscaming Region, resonably close to largeurban areas, with huge untapped potential fortourism and recreation development in the future.Tabaret will severely reduce this potential. 9) Tabaret provides zero long-term economic benefitfor the region through employment. The plan is forthe station to be completely automated andremotely operated. 10) The Kipawa River is 12,000 years old. The riverwas here thousands of years before any peoplecame to the region. The Tabaret project will change all that.

Problems on a local River?

  • There is more to do as well but you have to do your research and above all, don't give up.
  • IN the meantime prepared a document itemizing the history of navigation of this spot and its recreational value. Use the Kipawa river history of navigation as a guide: see www.kipawariver.ca
  • Under the Ministry of Environment guidelines you have a set period of time to petition the change under the environmental bill of rights, you may have limited time to take this action. But it involves going to court for a judicial review of the decision.
  • 4. contact the ministry of natural resources officials and do the same thing.
  • 3. contact the ministry of the environment and determine if they approved the project
  • 2. determine if the dam was a legal dam, approved under the navigable waters protection act.
  • 1. research the decision and timing of it to determine if an environmental assessment was done.

Minden Ontario

Minden Ontario
Gull River Water control at Horseshoe lake

A History of Navigation on the Kipawa River

Prior to the environmental assessment there was no signage at the Laniel Dam

T-Shirts Area: These are available now!

T-Shirts Area: These are available now!
Send $25 and a stamped self addressed envelop for the Tshirt, and for the bumper sticker, a stamped and self addressed envelope with $5.00 for the bumper sticker to Les Amis de la rivière Kipawa, 80 Ontario St., Ottawa, Ontario, K1K 1K9 or click the link To purchase a Les Amis "T" contact Doug with the following information: Number of shirts:Sizes: Ship to Address: Method of Payment: cash, cheque and paypal, Shipto address:

Bumper Stickers Now Available

Bumper Stickers Now Available
Get your bumper sticker and show your support for the Kipawa Legal Fund ! - send $5.00 in a Stamped, self addressed envelope to: Peter Karwacki Box 39111, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1H 7X0